<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MarkJakubik.comSentencing | MarkJakubik.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markjakubik.com/category/sentencing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markjakubik.com</link>
	<description>The assorted observations of a legal conservative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who Is More Dangerous?</title>
		<link>http://markjakubik.com/2008/08/12/who-is-more-dangerous/</link>
		<comments>http://markjakubik.com/2008/08/12/who-is-more-dangerous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White collar defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Olis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Collar Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjakubik.com/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man on the right is Salim Ahmed Hamdan. He was Osama bin Laden&#8217;s driver. He was convicted of materially aiding terrorists. He was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in prison. The man on the left is Jamie Olis. He was an accountant for Dynergy Corp., and was convicted of materially aiding activities that were...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.kir.com/archives/Jamie%20Olis3.jpg" alt="" width="188" height="281" /><img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/09gF9B29AY5xZ/340x.jpg" alt="" width="193" height="281" /></p>
<p>The man on the right is Salim Ahmed Hamdan. He was Osama bin Laden&#8217;s driver. He was convicted of materially aiding terrorists. He was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in prison. The man on the left is Jamie Olis. He was an accountant for Dynergy Corp., and was convicted of materially aiding activities that were later determined to be &#8220;fraudulent tax planning.&#8221; He was sentenced to more than 24 years in prison (reduced to 6 years &#8211; still 6 months more than bin Laden&#8217;s driver &#8211; after appeal). Tell me, who is more dangerous. And what do these two sentences tell us about the priorities of our justice system and our political classes. Free Jamie Olis!</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkjakubik.com%2F2008%2F08%2F12%2Fwho-is-more-dangerous%2F&amp;title=Who%20Is%20More%20Dangerous%3F" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://markjakubik.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markjakubik.com/2008/08/12/who-is-more-dangerous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NatWest 3 To Be Sentenced</title>
		<link>http://markjakubik.com/2008/02/21/natwest-3-to-be-sentenced/</link>
		<comments>http://markjakubik.com/2008/02/21/natwest-3-to-be-sentenced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White collar defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjakubik.com/2008/02/23/natwest-3-to-be-sentenced/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three British bankers are to be sentenced Friday for their roles in a fraudulent scheme involving collapsed U.S. energy company Enron.David Bermingham, Giles Darby and Gary Mulgrew each face up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.In November, the three men each pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Three British bankers are to be sentenced Friday for their roles in a fraudulent scheme involving collapsed U.S. energy company <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron" class="linelink" target="new">Enron</a>.David Bermingham, Giles Darby and Gary Mulgrew each face up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.In November, the three men each pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud as part of a plea agreement after initially saying they were innocent of colluding with former Enron Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow in a secret financial scam in 2000 to enrich themselves at their employer&#8217;s expense.</p>
<p>Federal prosecutors are recommending that U.S. District Judge Ewing Werlein Jr. sentence each of the men to just over three years in prison.</p>
<p>All three have also agreed to pay their former employer more than $13 million.</p>
<p>Their attorneys have said they will work with prosecutors to see if the bankers can serve part of their sentences in Britain.</p>
<p>The three former executives at <a href="http://www.natwest.com/" class="linelink" target="new">Greenwich NatWest</a>, a unit of Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, became a cause celebre in Britain throughout extradition proceedings that lasted two years. They were dubbed the &#8220;NatWest Three.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the United States, their case is a loose end from Enron&#8217;s collapse.</p>
<p>Greenwich NatWest had invested in a subsidiary of an Enron partnership controlled by Fastow, the architect of myriad fraudulent Enron schemes that helped fuel its spiral into bankruptcy proceedings.</p>
<p>In early 2000, the bank had valued its interest in the subsidiary at zero, but the three British men knew it actually had significant value.</p>
<p>A company under the control of Michael Kopper, Fastow&#8217;s former top aide, purchased the bank&#8217;s interest in the subsidiary for $1 million.</p>
<p>The bankers, who came to Houston, paid Kopper $250,000 for an interest in this company. Fastow falsely represented to Enron that the energy company would pay $20 million to Greenwich NatWest for its shares of the subsidiary.</p>
<p>But the $20 million actually went to the British bankers, Fastow and others. The bankers got $7.3 million while Fastow, Kopper and others skimmed about $12.3 million, according to the plea deal.</p>
<p>For their roles in Enron&#8217;s collapse, Fastow is serving a six-year sentence while Kopper was given a three-year, one-month sentence.</p>
<p>Enron, once the nation&#8217;s seventh-largest company, crumbled into bankruptcy in December 2001 after years of accounting tricks could no longer hide billions in debt or make failing ventures appear profitable. The collapse wiped out thousands of jobs, more than $60 billion in market value and more than $2 billion in pension plans.</p>
<p>Enron founder Kenneth Lay and former chief executive Jeffrey Skilling were convicted in 2006 for their roles in the company&#8217;s collapse. Skilling is serving a sentence of more than 24 years. Lay&#8217;s convictions for conspiracy, fraud and other charges were wiped out after he died of heart disease in 2006.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1203677129463">The Associated Press</a> (via Law.com)</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Each of the three former NatWest bankers were sentenced on Friday to terms of imprisonment of 37 months.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkjakubik.com%2F2008%2F02%2F21%2Fnatwest-3-to-be-sentenced%2F&amp;title=NatWest%203%20To%20Be%20Sentenced" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://markjakubik.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markjakubik.com/2008/02/21/natwest-3-to-be-sentenced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court OK&#8217;s Longer Sentences for &#8220;Career Armed Criminals&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://markjakubik.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-oks-longer-sentences-for-career-armed-criminals/</link>
		<comments>http://markjakubik.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-oks-longer-sentences-for-career-armed-criminals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jakubik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjakubik.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-oks-longer-sentences-for-career-armed-criminals/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bolstering the troubling trend toward more, and longer, mandatory minimum sentences, the Supreme Court today upheld the federal Armed Career Criminal Act, which allows prosecutors to seek longer mandatory sentences if a defendant has 3 or more prior convictions for crimes that are either violent felonies or serious drug offenses. In James v. United States,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolstering the troubling trend toward more, and longer, mandatory minimum sentences, the Supreme Court today <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070418/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_career_criminals">upheld</a> the federal Armed Career Criminal Act, which allows prosecutors to seek longer mandatory sentences if a defendant has 3 or more prior convictions for crimes that are either violent felonies or serious drug offenses. In <i>James v. United States</i>, the Court upheld application of the law where one of the defendants prior convictions was for attempted burglary. As a consequence, James sentence was increased from not more than 6 years to a mandatory minimum of 15 years.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkjakubik.com%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Fsupreme-court-oks-longer-sentences-for-career-armed-criminals%2F&amp;title=Supreme%20Court%20OK%E2%80%99s%20Longer%20Sentences%20for%20%E2%80%9CCareer%20Armed%20Criminals%E2%80%9D" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://markjakubik.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markjakubik.com/2007/04/18/supreme-court-oks-longer-sentences-for-career-armed-criminals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentencing is Out of Whack</title>
		<link>http://markjakubik.com/2007/02/14/sentencing-is-out-of-whack/</link>
		<comments>http://markjakubik.com/2007/02/14/sentencing-is-out-of-whack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jakubik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjakubik.com/2007/02/14/sentencing-is-out-of-whack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stuart Taylor, who always has an interesting viewpoint on legal matters, has written an excellent essay for the National Journal in which he discusses the completely out of whack sentencing system. Taylor focuses on the recent trend of lengthy prison terms for white collar offenders. In my view, Taylor hots the nail squarely on the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart Taylor, who always has an interesting viewpoint on legal matters, has written an <a href="http://nationaljournal.com/taylor.htm">excellent essay</a> for the National Journal in which he discusses the completely out of whack sentencing system. Taylor focuses on the recent trend of lengthy prison terms for white collar offenders. In my view, Taylor hots the nail squarely on the head. I challenge anyone to offer a rational explanation as to how sending defendants such as Bernie Ebbers and Jeff Skilling to prison for 25 years is compatible with justice, especially in a world where many sent to prison for homicide and similar serious, violent offenses, serve far less time.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkjakubik.com%2F2007%2F02%2F14%2Fsentencing-is-out-of-whack%2F&amp;title=Sentencing%20is%20Out%20of%20Whack" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://markjakubik.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markjakubik.com/2007/02/14/sentencing-is-out-of-whack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Mandatory Minimum Sentences are EVIL</title>
		<link>http://markjakubik.com/2007/01/25/why-mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://markjakubik.com/2007/01/25/why-mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jakubik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjakubik.com/2007/01/25/why-mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-evil/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESPN the Magazine, not normally known for its coverage of things legal brings us this outrageous story of a high school honor student and sports star now doing 10 years on a conviction for &#8220;aggravated child molestation.&#8221; Seems the young man was stupid enough to receive oral sex at a party from a girl, who...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN the Magazine, not normally known for its coverage of things legal brings us this <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=wilson" target="_blank">outrageous story</a> of a high school honor student and sports star now doing 10 years on a conviction for &#8220;aggravated child molestation.&#8221; Seems the young man was stupid enough to receive oral sex at a party from a girl, who everyone agrees initiated the encounter, who was just 2 years younger thna he was, but still a year under the age of consent. Under Georgia law, if the boy and girl had had intercourse, he&#8217;d have been charged with a misdemeanor. For some odd, stupid reason, the act of oral sex qualified him for the child mloestation charge (evidently the state legislature re-wrote the law, but refused to apply it retroactively). For some reason of politics or pure spite, the prosecutors chose to charge and prosecute an offense that they knew did not fit the facts. So much for justice. Let Genarlow Wilson pay the price for some pathetic prosecutor&#8217;s political ambitions.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkjakubik.com%2F2007%2F01%2F25%2Fwhy-mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-evil%2F&amp;title=Why%20Mandatory%20Minimum%20Sentences%20are%20EVIL" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://markjakubik.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markjakubik.com/2007/01/25/why-mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Up With the Supreme Court and Sentencing Guidelines?</title>
		<link>http://markjakubik.com/2007/01/25/whats-up-with-the-supreme-court-and-sentencing-guidelines/</link>
		<comments>http://markjakubik.com/2007/01/25/whats-up-with-the-supreme-court-and-sentencing-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jakubik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjakubik.com/2007/01/25/whats-up-with-the-supreme-court-and-sentencing-guidelines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emily Bazelon, with whom I usually disagree, and usually vehemently, has this very interesting article posted on Slate in which she discusses the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent Cunningham decision, in which the Court struck down California&#8217;s criminal sentencing guidelines. Emily discusses the somewhat peculiar alliances at work in the case (Scalia and Thomas, joined by Chief...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily Bazelon, with whom I usually disagree, and usually vehemently, has this <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2158034/fr/flyout" target="_blank">very interesting article</a> posted on <a href="http://slate.com">Slate</a> in which she discusses the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent <em>Cunningham</em> decision, in which the Court struck down California&#8217;s criminal sentencing guidelines. Emily discusses the somewhat peculiar alliances at work in the case (Scalia and Thomas, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, voting to strike the guidelines down, while Justice Alito a former federal prosecutor and Justice Kennedy voting with the liberal block to uphold the guidelines), the Court&#8217;s recent sentencing jurisprudence, such as it is, and what might be ahead in this area of the law.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkjakubik.com%2F2007%2F01%2F25%2Fwhats-up-with-the-supreme-court-and-sentencing-guidelines%2F&amp;title=What%E2%80%99s%20Up%20With%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20and%20Sentencing%20Guidelines%3F" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://markjakubik.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markjakubik.com/2007/01/25/whats-up-with-the-supreme-court-and-sentencing-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

